Air pollution and climate warming are two leading environmental problems. Although they are clearly distinguishable, both problems are closely linked since they can be traced back to the same source: carbon burning. Usually, air pollution and climate warming are measured by different indicators. Most of these indicators, however, are not sensitive to intervention strategies and policies. In this post, a more valid, sensitive and co-shared indicator is introduced.
As we all know, a key indicator of air pollution is the Air Quality Index (AQI), which reports real-time ambient air quality. It is calculated for four major air pollutants: particle matters (PM2.5, PM10), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and ground level ozone (O3). These pollutants are usually emitted together with the key greenhouse gas – CO2. The AQI tells people how clean or unhealthy the ambient air is, and what associated health effects may be a concern. It changes from day to day or even hour to hour.
In recent years, some agencies and governments in Asia and Europe are using the average AQI as an outcome indicator to evaluate the effectiveness of relevant policies and interventions targeting air pollution. However, this indicator may not be valid and reliable for two reasons. First, it varies with weather including temperature and wind. Second, it is not sensitive in estimating the amount of air pollutants as it ignores the range of air pollution. Sometimes, air pollution may expand with the increased amount of air pollutants, whereas the AQI may not increase.
The indicator popularly used for climate change is temperature. It also changes from day to day. Very often, monthly or yearly average temperature is calculated and used as an indicator of climate change. Practically, however, it is rare for local and national agencies to use temperature as an outcome indicator to assess the effectiveness of interventions and policies aiming to mitigate climate change, since it may vary over time and is not sensitive.
As climate change is correlated with the amount of greenhouse gases, much attention has been paid to fossil CO2 emissions in each nation. Given the disparity in pollution sizes and land areas in different nations, however, the total amount of fossil CO2 emissions may not be comparable across countries. In order to increase data comparability, fossil CO2 emission per capita is often used as an alternative indicator in international reports. This indicator, however, is also subject to reliability concern due to the variability in pollution size. Most importantly, it cannot exactly indicate where the air is seriously polluted, due to the disparity in population density in different nations.
Compared to the indicators mentioned above, fossil CO2 emissions per square mile/kilometer is a more valid and reliable indicator, since land area is almost always stable for nearly all countries. The indicator is more sensitive than temperature and AQI. It is an ideal indicator for examination of time trends of fossil CO2 emissions within a nation. It is also an indicator most suitable for geographical comparison of fossil CO2 emissions across different countries.
Fossil CO2 emissions per square mile/kilometer is not only associated with climate change, but also with air pollution. Usually, high CO2 levels may indicate high levels of other air pollutants, since the burning of fuels not only releases CO2, but also generates other air pollutants such as NO, NO2, SO2, SO3 and PM2.5. Although different fossil fuels release different amounts of air pollutants, reducing CO2 emissions can help to address both climate change and air pollution.
Nowadays, an integrated way is increasingly being used for reducing air pollution and mitigating climate change. Fossil CO2 emissions per square mile/kilometer is an ideal and sensitive indicator that can be used to assess the effectiveness of interventional strategies or policies for reducing air pollution and mitigating climate warming. It is not only applicable at national level, but also applicable at state or city level. Given that different fuels usually release different amounts of air pollutants, it is also important to record the percentage of each kind of fossil fuel.
So far, fossil CO2 emissions per square mile/kilometer as an indicator is ignored in international reports, even though fossil CO2 emissions per capita and per sector are often documented. Based on the latest database released by the Global Carbon Budget 2018 on 5 December 2018, we have calculated fossil CO2 emissions per square mile/kilometer for each nation or territory, and presented the information at the following links:
List of Countries by Fossil CO2 Emissions Per Square Mile in 2017
The List of Countries Ranked by Fossil CO2 Emissions Per Square Kilometer
Hi, very nice website, cheers!
Need cheap and reliable hosting? Our shared plans start at $10 for an year and VPS plans for $6/Mo.
Check here: https://www.reliable-webhosting.com/
bandar ceme 99 says
I’m amazed, I must say. Seldom do I encounter a blog
that’s both educative and entertaining, and let me tell you, you’ve hit the nail on the head.
The problem is something not enough men and women are speaking intelligently about.
I am very happy I stumbled across this during my hunt for something regarding this.